Pakistan's World Cup journey took an unexpected turn, and the blame game has begun. The Green Shirts' exit from the T20 World Cup has sparked a controversy, with fingers pointing at none other than the head coach, Mike Hesson.
But here's where it gets controversial: Hesson, it seems, took on more roles than just coaching. Sources reveal he acted as a selector and even a captain, leaving the official captain, Salman Ali Agha, with little authority.
During the tournament, Hesson's decisions were reportedly arbitrary and costly. For instance, he insisted on including Babar Azam in the squad, despite initial reservations from the selection committee. This move backfired, as Babar's performance failed to meet expectations.
And this is the part most people miss: Hesson's influence extended beyond player selection. He allegedly dictated on-field strategies, deciding when bowlers should bowl and when batters should bat. For instance, in the match against India, the decision to delay Usman Tariq's bowling was made by Hesson and the bowling coach, Ashley Noffke.
The PCB has received a report on Hesson's performance, but they've decided to let him continue with the team for the Bangladesh tour, avoiding an immediate decision. However, his future beyond that tour is uncertain.
Highly reliable sources claim that Hesson's overstepping of boundaries cost the team dearly. The team's failure to progress beyond the Super Eight stage and the players' substandard performances have led to widespread criticism and fines. But is the blame solely on the players?
Sources reveal that Hesson's control extended to every aspect of the game, leaving little room for the captain's input. Salman Agha, described as a weak captain, seemingly followed Hesson's instructions blindly.
The decision to sideline Fakhar Zaman and promote Saim Ayub, despite consistent failures, further highlights Hesson's influence. Even the bowling changes, like dropping Abrar Ahmed to allegedly protect Shadab Khan's place, were reportedly directed by Hesson and Noffke.
In the match against England, a surprising move saw Usman Tariq, who took a wicket with his first ball, replaced by Saim Ayub. This decision, too, is attributed to Hesson.
Some senior players have expressed their dissatisfaction with Hesson's lack of communication regarding their omissions from the team.
So, what's next for Hesson? The PCB's decision to let him continue with the team to Bangladesh suggests a lack of immediate action. But will he survive the post-tour scrutiny?
What are your thoughts on Hesson's role in Pakistan's World Cup exit? Do you think he should continue as head coach, or is it time for a change? Feel free to share your opinions in the comments below!
